 |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
|
Comparisons 08-01-2024 Comprehensive testing data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as PassMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Neocore, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9 etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy Kirin 9000SL or Snapdragon 7 Gen 3.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 9000SL | 33% |
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | 42% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 9000SL | 86% |
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | 87% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 9000SL | 32% |
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | 40% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 9000SL |
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Total score | 716097 | 913715 | CPU | 200500 | 255850 | GPU | 272118 | 347209 | MEM | 114579 | 146184 | UX | 128898 | 164466 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 9000SL |
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Single-Core | 1026 | 1274 | Multi-Core | 3919 | 4018 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 9000SL |
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Frequency | 2350 MHz | 2630 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | 10200 millions | Core configuration | 1x2.35 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 2910 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 86 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 1 MB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is 10% better than Kirin 9000SL in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Maleoon 910 | Adreno 730 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 900 MHz | GFloPS | 2056 | 1840 | # of Cores | 4 | | # of Shader Units | | 1024 | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.2 | 34.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 83.6 | 107.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.2 | 64.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 47.1 | 59.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 72.2 | 91.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 105.3 | 133.3 | Real Racing 3 | 64.8 | 129.3 | Sniper 3D | 67.3 | 143.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 72.1 | 91.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 75.3 | 92.2 | CSR Racing 2 | 72.4 | 78.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP9, VP8, Hybrid Log Gamma (HLG) |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X63 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 5500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 3700 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Galileo, NavIC, GPS, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, NavIC enabled, GNSS, GLONASS, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is better: 34 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 9000SL SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|