 |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
|
Comparisons 08-01-2024 Detailed comparison data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, Vellamo, Neocore, PassMark, PCMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in GTA, Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Kirin 9000SL or Dimensity 9300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 9000SL | 33% |
Dimensity 9300 | 100% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 9000SL | 86% |
Dimensity 9300 | 86% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 9000SL | 32% |
Dimensity 9300 | 97% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 9000SL |
Dimensity 9300 | Total score | 716097 | 1391808 | CPU | 200500 | 389698 | GPU | 272118 | 528887 | MEM | 114579 | 222686 | UX | 128898 | 250527 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 9000SL |
Dimensity 9300 | Single-Core | 1026 | 1591 | Multi-Core | 3919 | 5786 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 9000SL |
Dimensity 9300 | Frequency | 2350 MHz | 3000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | 9200 millions | Core configuration | 1x2.35 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A720 2x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A520 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR5x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 7500 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 52 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 1 MB | L2 cache | | 8 MB | L3 cache | | 32 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 9300 is 21% better than Kirin 9000SL in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Maleoon 910 | Immortalis-G720 MC20 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 2056 | 3600 | # of Cores | 4 | 20 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.2 | 52.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 83.6 | 165.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.2 | 98.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 47.1 | 91.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 72.2 | 140.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 105.3 | 202.7 | Real Racing 3 | 64.8 | 198.2 | Sniper 3D | 67.3 | 216.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 72.1 | 137.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 75.3 | 143.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 72.4 | 118.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 3100 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9300 is better: 35 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Kirin 9000SL SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Dimensity 9300 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|