MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200

Comparisons 01-05-2023

Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, Neocore, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, and how good the SoCs are in games Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7050 or Dimensity 9200.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7050

40%

Dimensity 9200

91%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7050

83%

Dimensity 9200

84%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7050

37%

Dimensity 9200

89%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7050	Dimensity 9200
Total score	617016	1268278
CPU	172759	355109
GPU	234461	481953
MEM	98726	202930
UX	111058	228299

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7050	Dimensity 9200
Single-Core	989	1450
Multi-Core	3441	5272

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7050	Dimensity 9200
Frequency	2600 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	4 nm
Transistors count		9200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	7500
Memory bandwidth	24	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		1 MB
L2 cache		8 MB
L3 cache		32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 9200 is 13% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7050 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G68 MC4	Immortalis-G715 MC16
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	686	3200
# of Cores	4	16
# of Shader Units	128
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.8	48.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	69.3	150.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	95.7	90.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	53.2	83.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	59.1	128.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	87.4	185.4
Real Racing 3	191.4	180.1
Sniper 3D	210.6	198.7
Need for Speed No Limits	153.8	125.7
Mortal Kombat X	153.8	130.3
CSR Racing 2	134.9	108.2

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	20 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3500 MBit/s.	7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2000 MBit/s.	3100 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9200 is better: 31
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7050 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7050 specs and review.

Dimensity 9200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 9200 specs and review.