Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 benchmark which processor is better

HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Comparisons   16-01-2024
   Comprehensive compare data of HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, GFXBench, PCMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, PassMark, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite, Call of Duty etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy Kirin 8000 or MediaTek Dimensity 7050.


 
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
MediaTek Dimensity 7050

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Kirin 800030% MediaTek Dimensity 705040%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Kirin 800086% MediaTek Dimensity 705083%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Kirin 800027% MediaTek Dimensity 705037%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Kirin 8000 MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Total score659883617016
CPU184769172759
GPU250747234461
MEM10557498726
UX118769111058

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Kirin 8000 MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Single-Core945989
Multi-Core36113441

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Kirin 8000 MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Frequency2200 MHz2600 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm6 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)6 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR5, LPDDR4xLPDDR4x, LPDDR5
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency16002133
Memory bandwidth4424
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.4-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is 15% better than Kirin 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMaleoon 910Mali-G68 MC4
GPU Frequency750 MHz800 MHz
GFloPS2056686
# of Cores44
# of Shader Units128
Display2560 x 1600 pixels2520 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile30.628.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)74.969.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra103.695.7
Call of Duty: Mobile57.753.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)64.659.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition94.687.4
Real Racing 3128.5191.4
Sniper 3D165.8210.6
Need for Speed No Limits144.2153.8
Mortal Kombat X118.7153.8
CSR Racing 2144.5134.9
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution128 MP200 MP
Dual Camera resolution48 MP20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS60240
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemBalong 5G5G Multi-Mode
Download speed15000 MBit/s.3500 MBit/s.
Upload speed14000 MBit/s.2000 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouNavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 8000 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is better: 13
   You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 8000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Kirin 8000 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


MediaTek Dimensity 7050 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Allwinner A523
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands