 |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs Apple A16 Bionic |
|
Comparisons 08-01-2024 Comprehensive comparison data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs Apple A16 Bionic, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like 3DMark, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, Geekbench, PassMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9 etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Kirin 9000SL or A16 Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreKirin 9000SL | 33% |
A16 Bionic | 71% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Kirin 9000SL | 86% |
A16 Bionic | 84% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingKirin 9000SL | 32% |
A16 Bionic | 70% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Kirin 9000SL |
A16 Bionic | Total score | 716097 | 994406 | CPU | 200500 | 278424 | GPU | 272118 | 377874 | MEM | 114579 | 159102 | UX | 128898 | 179002 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Kirin 9000SL |
A16 Bionic | Single-Core | 1026 | 1903 | Multi-Core | 3919 | 5589 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Kirin 9000SL |
A16 Bionic | Frequency | 2350 MHz | 3460 MHz | Cores | 8 | 6 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | 16000 millions | Core configuration | 1x2.35 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x3.46 GHz ARM 4x2.02 GHz ARM | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 96 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 2 MB | L2 cache | | 8 MB | L3 cache | | 64 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A16 Bionic is 32% better than Kirin 9000SL in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 9000SL has -2 more core than A16 Bionic. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Maleoon 910 | Apple A16 Bionic | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 3460 MHz | GFloPS | 2056 | 3200 | # of Cores | 4 | 5 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 27.2 | 37.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 83.6 | 118.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.2 | 69.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 47.1 | 64.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 72.2 | 100.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 105.3 | 145.3 | Real Racing 3 | 64.8 | 141.5 | Sniper 3D | 67.3 | 155.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 72.1 | 98.4 | Mortal Kombat X | 75.3 | 101.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 72.4 | 85.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 12 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Apple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | 5G Modem | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 9000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NavIC enabled, GNSS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic is better: 34 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 9000SL SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
A16 Bionic SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Apple A16 Bionic Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs Apple A9 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|