Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus benchmark which processor is better

HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

Comparisons   08-01-2024
   Full compare data of HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as PCMark, AnTuTu, Geekbench, Quadrant, PassMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, and how good the chipsets are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy Kirin 9000SL or Dimensity 9200 Plus.


 
HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Kirin 9000SL33% Dimensity 9200 Plus99%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Kirin 9000SL86% Dimensity 9200 Plus86%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Kirin 9000SL32% Dimensity 9200 Plus97%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Kirin 9000SL Dimensity 9200 Plus
Total score7160971384198
CPU200500387571
GPU272118526003
MEM114579221468
UX128898249146

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Kirin 9000SL Dimensity 9200 Plus
Single-Core10261583
Multi-Core39195754

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Kirin 9000SL Dimensity 9200 Plus
Frequency2350 MHz3350 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm4 nm
Transistors count9200 millions
Core configuration1x2.35 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
1x3.35 GHz ARM Cortex-X3
3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A715
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)6 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR5, LPDDR4xLPDDR5x
Max. Memory16 Gb32 Gb
Memory Frequency16008553
Memory bandwidth4464
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache1 MB
L2 cache8 MB
L3 cache32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 9200 Plus is 29% better than Kirin 9000SL in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMaleoon 910Immortalis-G715 MC16
GPU Frequency750 MHz750 MHz
GFloPS20563200
# of Cores416
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1600 pixels2560 x 1440 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile27.252.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)83.6164.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra51.298.6
Call of Duty: Mobile47.191.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)72.2140.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition105.3201.9
Real Racing 364.8197.4
Sniper 3D67.3215.7
Need for Speed No Limits72.1137.7
Mortal Kombat X75.3142.3
CSR Racing 272.4118.6
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution128 MP320 MP
Dual Camera resolution48 MP64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS60240
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD8K, 4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1


Networks and Navigation
ModemBalong 5GSub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed15000 MBit/s.7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed14000 MBit/s.3100 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGalileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus is better: 34
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Kirin 9000SL SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Dimensity 9200 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Kirin 9000SL SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


Dimensity 9200 Plus SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands