|
Intel Core i7-13790F vs Apple M1 Ultra |
|
Processor comparisons 09-02-2023 If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i7-13790F vs Apple M1 Ultra tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like RealBench, Gears 5, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, AIDA64, PassMark, Blender, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Prime95, 7zip, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt. Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M1 Ultra or Intel Core i7-13790F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-13790F | 65% |
M1 Ultra | 68% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Ultra is 4% better than Core i7-13790F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-13790F | 61% |
M1 Ultra | 64% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Control, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 108.4 | 113.1 | Valorant | 123.2 | 128.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.0 | 72.0 | Apex Legends | 115.8 | 120.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.4 | 96.4 | Overwatch | 99.8 | 104.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.0 | 88.7 | DOOM Eternal | 61.6 | 64.3 | Warzone | 96.1 | 100.3 | Assassin's Creed | 103.5 | 108.0 | Valheim | 102.3 | 106.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-13790F | 107% |
M1 Ultra | 272% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Ultra is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13790F as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 20W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 470 | 555 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4751 | 3252 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 770 | 1103 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10536 | 5583 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2680 | 4240 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30282 | 21959 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Single-Core | 2451 | 9611 | Multi-Core | 51601 | 62194 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Single-Core | 2095 | 1637 | Multi-Core | 20045 | 24642 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-13790F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | April 09, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | M1 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 16x Firestorm and 4x Icestorm | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 16 | 20 | Threads | 24 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 114000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 20 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 818 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 24 MB | 48MB | L3 cache | 33 MB | 96MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | APL1W06 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13790F is 21% better than M1 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 Ultra has 4 more core than Core i7-13790F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13790F is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Ultra is better: 24 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-13790F and Apple M1 Ultra before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13790F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Apple M1 Ultra Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|