|
Intel Core i5-13490F vs Apple M1 Ultra |
|
Processor comparisons 08-02-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13490F vs Apple M1 Ultra and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Handbrake, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Prime95, PassMark, Blender, Gears 5, SuperPi, RealBench, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, MATLAB, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15). Gaming performance of processors in: - Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M1 Ultra or Intel Core i5-13490F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13490F | 59% |
M1 Ultra | 68% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Ultra is 13% better than Core i5-13490F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13490F | 57% |
M1 Ultra | 64% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.0 | 113.1 | Valorant | 114.7 | 128.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.3 | 72.0 | Apex Legends | 107.9 | 120.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.1 | 96.4 | Overwatch | 92.9 | 104.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.2 | 88.7 | DOOM Eternal | 57.4 | 64.3 | Warzone | 89.5 | 100.3 | Assassin's Creed | 96.4 | 108.0 | Valheim | 95.2 | 106.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13490F | 84% |
M1 Ultra | 272% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Ultra is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13490F since it has less power consumption: 75W vs. 20W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 555 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2964 | 3252 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 482 | 1103 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6580 | 5583 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1674 | 4240 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18910 | 21959 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Single-Core | 1530 | 9611 | Multi-Core | 32223 | 62194 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Single-Core | 1895 | 1637 | Multi-Core | 12714 | 24642 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13490F |
Apple M1 Ultra | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | April 09, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | M1 | Core name | Raptor Lake | 16x Firestorm and 4x Icestorm | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 13 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 10 | 20 | Threads | 16 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 114000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 75 W | 20 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 818 GByte/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 9 MB | 48MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 96MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | APL1W06 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13490F is 3% better than M1 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 Ultra has 10 more core than Core i5-13490F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13490F is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Ultra is better: 28 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13490F and Apple M1 Ultra before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13490F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Apple M1 Ultra Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|