 |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs Intel Core i9-8950HK |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs Intel Core i9-8950HK tests and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, PassMark, AIDA64, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Blender, MATLAB, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-8950HK or AMD Ryzen 7 3700C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 7 3700C | 52% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-8950HK is 1% better than Ryzen 7 3700C. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 7 3700C | 51% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.3 | 93.7 | | Valorant | 103.7 | 106.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.1 | 59.6 | | Apex Legends | 97.5 | 100.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.8 | 79.8 | | Overwatch | 84.0 | 86.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.6 | 73.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 53.2 | | Warzone | 80.9 | 83.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.1 | 89.4 | | Valheim | 86.1 | 88.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 7 3700C | 218% |
Core i9-8950HK | 82% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 3700C is more energy efficient than the Core i9-8950HK as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 149 | 211 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 715 | 1269 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 374 | 344 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1545 | 3004 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 647 | 729 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3756 | 7064 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Single-Core | 2050 | 2480 | | Multi-Core | 7515 | 10640 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Single-Core | 981 | 1107 | | Multi-Core | 3228 | 5554 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP5 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Picasso | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | | Generation | 3 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 12 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 4600 millions | 2000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | YM370CC4T4MFG
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-8950HK is 20% better than Ryzen 7 3700C in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-8950HK has 2 more core than Ryzen 7 3700C. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 3700C is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-8950HK is better: 29
Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 7 3700C and Intel Core i9-8950HK before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i9-8950HK Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
|
|
|
