 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Intel Core i9-8950HK |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Intel Core i9-8950HK tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming, video editing. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, 7zip, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Handbrake, SuperPi, Furmark, 3DMark, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, RealBench, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-8950HK or AMD Ryzen 7 5825C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 56% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 5825C is 5% better than Core i9-8950HK. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 7 5825C | 53% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 94.8 | 93.7 | | Valorant | 107.8 | 106.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.3 | 59.6 | | Apex Legends | 101.3 | 100.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.8 | 79.8 | | Overwatch | 87.3 | 86.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.4 | 73.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.9 | 53.2 | | Warzone | 84.1 | 83.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.5 | 89.4 | | Valheim | 89.4 | 88.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 288% |
Core i9-8950HK | 82% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 5825C is more energy efficient than the Core i9-8950HK as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 211 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1956 | 1269 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 474 | 344 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4279 | 3004 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1170 | 729 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11896 | 7064 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Single-Core | 2603 | 2480 | | Multi-Core | 21502 | 10640 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Single-Core | 1300 | 1107 | | Multi-Core | 6695 | 5554 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Announcement date | May 29, 2022 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP6 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Barcelo | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 6 | | Threads | 16 | 12 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 2000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 4MB | | | L3 cache | 8MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-8950HK is 31% better than Ryzen 7 5825C in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 7 5825C has 2 more core than Core i9-8950HK. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-8950HK is better: 7
All the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 7 5825C and Intel Core i9-8950HK before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i9-8950HK Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
|
|
|
