 |
Intel Core i5-8365U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-8365U vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700C and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, AIDA64, 3DMark, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Blender, Handbrake, SuperPi, PassMark, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Prime95, Furmark, Gears 5, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
And how good the processors are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 3700C or Intel Core i5-8365U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-8365U | 51% |
Ryzen 7 3700C | 52% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 3700C is 1% better than Core i5-8365U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-8365U | 52% |
Ryzen 7 3700C | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.7 | 91.3 | | Valorant | 104.2 | 103.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.4 | 58.1 | | Apex Legends | 98.0 | 97.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.2 | 77.8 | | Overwatch | 84.4 | 84.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.9 | 71.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.1 | 51.9 | | Warzone | 81.3 | 80.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.6 | 87.1 | | Valheim | 86.5 | 86.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-8365U | 218% |
Ryzen 7 3700C | 218% |
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-8365U |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 167 | 149 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 558 | 715 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 422 | 374 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1400 | 1545 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 862 | 647 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3379 | 3756 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8365U |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | | Single-Core | 2189 | 2050 | | Multi-Core | 6412 | 7515 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8365U |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | | Single-Core | 981 | 981 | | Multi-Core | 3655 | 3228 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-8365U |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C | | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | September 22, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FP5 | | Core name | Whiskey Lake | Picasso | | Architecture | x86 | Zen+ | | Generation | 8 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4 MHz | | Frequency | 1.6 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm | | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 4600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| YM370CC4T4MFG
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 3700C is 30% better than Core i5-8365U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8365U is better: 22
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 3700C is better: 8
However, it should be understood that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-8365U and AMD Ryzen 7 3700C before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-8365U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i3-8350K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
|
|
|
