 |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625C vs Intel Core i9-8950HK |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 5 5625C vs Intel Core i9-8950HK and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering, programming. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Handbrake, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, PCMark 10, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Gears 5, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, 3DMark, Furmark, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, 7zip.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-8950HK or AMD Ryzen 5 5625C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 5 5625C | 55% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 5625C is 3% better than Core i9-8950HK. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 5 5625C | 53% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 94.5 | 93.7 | | Valorant | 107.4 | 106.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.2 | 59.6 | | Apex Legends | 101.0 | 100.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.6 | 79.8 | | Overwatch | 87.0 | 86.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.1 | 73.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.7 | 53.2 | | Warzone | 83.8 | 83.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.2 | 89.4 | | Valheim | 89.2 | 88.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 5 5625C | 340% |
Core i9-8950HK | 82% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 5625C is more energy efficient than the Core i9-8950HK since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 5625C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 194 | 211 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1723 | 1269 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 426 | 344 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3756 | 3004 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1035 | 729 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10419 | 7064 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 5625C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Single-Core | 2289 | 2480 | | Multi-Core | 18825 | 10640 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 5625C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Single-Core | 1531 | 1107 | | Multi-Core | 6403 | 5554 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 5 5625C |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Announcement date | May 29, 2022 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP6 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Barcelo | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 6 | | Threads | 12 | 12 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 2000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 4MB | | | L3 cache | 8MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-8950HK is 20% better than Ryzen 5 5625C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 5625C is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-8950HK is better: 8
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 5 5625C and Intel Core i9-8950HK before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 5 5625C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i9-8950HK Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
|
|
|
