|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs Intel Core i3-10325 |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs Intel Core i3-10325 tests and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Prime95, WPrime, PCMark 10, PassMark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Blender, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10325 or AMD Ryzen 7 3700C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 7 3700C | 52% |
Core i3-10325 | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 7 3700C | 51% |
Core i3-10325 | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.3 | 92.3 | Valorant | 103.7 | 104.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.1 | 58.7 | Apex Legends | 97.5 | 98.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.8 | 78.6 | Overwatch | 84.0 | 84.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.6 | 72.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 52.4 | Warzone | 80.9 | 81.8 | Assassin's Creed | 87.1 | 88.1 | Valheim | 86.1 | 87.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 7 3700C | 218% |
Core i3-10325 | 70% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 3700C is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10325 as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 149 | 196 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 715 | 984 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 374 | 454 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1545 | 2225 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 647 | 1183 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3756 | 4596 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Single-Core | 2050 | 2646 | Multi-Core | 7515 | 9196 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Single-Core | 981 | 1376 | Multi-Core | 3228 | 4192 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FP5 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Picasso | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 3 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4600 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 65 W | Memory type | | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM370CC4T4MFG
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10325 is 41% better than Ryzen 7 3700C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 3700C is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10325 is better: 28 Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 7 3700C and Intel Core i3-10325 before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i3-10325 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
| |
|