|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs Intel Core i7-6700HQ |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs Intel Core i7-6700HQ tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Furmark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, WPrime, Prime95, 3DMark, PCMark 10, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6700HQ or AMD Ryzen 7 3700C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 7 3700C | 52% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 51% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 3700C is 1% better than Core i7-6700HQ. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 7 3700C | 51% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.3 | 91.7 | Valorant | 103.7 | 104.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.1 | 58.4 | Apex Legends | 97.5 | 98.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.8 | 78.2 | Overwatch | 84.0 | 84.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.6 | 71.9 | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 52.1 | Warzone | 80.9 | 81.3 | Assassin's Creed | 87.1 | 87.5 | Valheim | 86.1 | 86.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 7 3700C | 218% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 71% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 3700C is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6700HQ since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 149 | 148 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 715 | 692 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 374 | 361 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1545 | 1651 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 647 | 891 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3756 | 3958 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Single-Core | 2050 | 1937 | Multi-Core | 7515 | 6493 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Single-Core | 981 | 971 | Multi-Core | 3228 | 3643 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP5 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Picasso | Skylake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 3 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4600 millions | 1880 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | Memory type | | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM370CC4T4MFG
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-6700HQ is 11% better than Ryzen 7 3700C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 3700C is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6700HQ is better: 22 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 7 3700C and Intel Core i7-6700HQ before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i7-6700HQ Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|