|
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs Intel Core i5-9300HF |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs Intel Core i5-9300HF and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, WPrime, PassMark, Blender, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, 7zip, SuperPi, RealBench, Gears 5, Handbrake, 3DMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-9300HF or AMD Ryzen 7 3700C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 7 3700C | 52% |
Core i5-9300HF | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 7 3700C | 51% |
Core i5-9300HF | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.3 | 92.3 | Valorant | 103.7 | 104.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.1 | 58.7 | Apex Legends | 97.5 | 98.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.8 | 78.7 | Overwatch | 84.0 | 85.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.6 | 72.4 | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 52.5 | Warzone | 80.9 | 81.8 | Assassin's Creed | 87.1 | 88.1 | Valheim | 86.1 | 87.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 7 3700C | 218% |
Core i5-9300HF | 81% | To make a final choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 3700C is more energy efficient than the Core i5-9300HF as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i5-9300HF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 149 | 156 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 715 | 593 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 374 | 422 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1545 | 2111 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 647 | 1024 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3756 | 4015 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i5-9300HF | Single-Core | 2050 | 2332 | Multi-Core | 7515 | 7619 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i5-9300HF | Single-Core | 981 | 1100 | Multi-Core | 3228 | 4228 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
Intel Core i5-9300HF | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP5 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Picasso | Coffee Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 3 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s DMI | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4600 millions | 3600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | Memory type | | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 41.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM370CC4T4MFG
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-9300HF is 4% better than Ryzen 7 3700C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 3700C is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-9300HF is better: 28 However, it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 7 3700C and Intel Core i5-9300HF before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i5-9300HF Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K
| |
|