 |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 3700C vs AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, AIDA64, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Handbrake, PassMark, MATLAB, Prime95, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, PCMark 10.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS or AMD Ryzen 7 3700C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 7 3700C | 52% |
Ryzen 9 6900HS | 58% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 6900HS is 10% better than Ryzen 7 3700C. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 7 3700C | 51% |
Ryzen 9 6900HS | 55% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.3 | 97.1 | | Valorant | 103.7 | 110.3 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.1 | 61.8 | | Apex Legends | 97.5 | 103.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.8 | 82.7 | | Overwatch | 84.0 | 89.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.6 | 76.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 55.2 | | Warzone | 80.9 | 86.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.1 | 92.7 | | Valheim | 86.1 | 91.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 7 3700C | 218% |
Ryzen 9 6900HS | 152% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 3700C is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 9 6900HS as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 149 | 247 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 715 | 2476 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 374 | 590 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1545 | 5437 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 647 | 1538 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3756 | 13848 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | | Single-Core | 2050 | 3303 | | Multi-Core | 7515 | 27389 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | | Single-Core | 981 | 1602 | | Multi-Core | 3228 | 8911 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 3700C |
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | | Announcement date | September 22, 2020 | January 09, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP5 | FP7 | | Core name | Picasso | Rembrandt | | Architecture | Zen+ | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 3 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 4.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Threads | 8 | 16 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 4600 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W | | Memory type | | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | 512KB | | L2 cache | | 4MB | | L3 cache | | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | YM370CC4T4MFG
| FP7:100-000000545 FP7r7:100-000000561
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 6900HS is 30% better than Ryzen 7 3700C in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 9 6900HS has 4 more core than Ryzen 7 3700C. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 3700C is better: 1
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is better: 33
However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 7 3700C and AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13700HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
