 |
Intel Core i7-8569U vs Intel Core i9-8950HK |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-8569U vs Intel Core i9-8950HK and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Blender, SuperPi, 3DMark, AIDA64, PassMark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, MATLAB, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, RealBench, Blender, UserBenchmark, WPrime.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-8950HK or Intel Core i7-8569U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-8569U | 52% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-8950HK is 1% better than Core i7-8569U. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-8569U | 52% |
Core i9-8950HK | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.7 | 93.7 | | Valorant | 105.4 | 106.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.0 | 59.6 | | Apex Legends | 99.0 | 100.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.0 | 79.8 | | Overwatch | 85.3 | 86.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.7 | 73.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.7 | 53.2 | | Warzone | 82.2 | 83.0 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.5 | 89.4 | | Valheim | 87.5 | 88.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-8569U | 143% |
Core i9-8950HK | 82% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8569U is more energy efficient than the Core i9-8950HK since it has less power consumption: 28W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 190 | 211 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 947 | 1269 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 412 | 344 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1802 | 3004 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1157 | 729 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5762 | 7064 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Single-Core | 2857 | 2480 | | Multi-Core | 9278 | 10640 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Single-Core | 1203 | 1107 | | Multi-Core | 4632 | 5554 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i9-8950HK | | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 8 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 2.9 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 12 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 2000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 28 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-8950HK is 3% better than Core i7-8569U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-8950HK has 2 more core than Core i7-8569U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8569U is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-8950HK is better: 25
Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-8569U and Intel Core i9-8950HK before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-8569U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i9-8950HK Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
|
|
|
