 |
Intel Core i9-9880H vs Intel Core i7-11370H |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-9880H vs Intel Core i7-11370H and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like WPrime, Handbrake, Blender, 3DMark, SuperPi, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, PCMark 10, 7zip, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Blender.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11370H or Intel Core i9-9880H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i9-9880H | 54% |
Core i7-11370H | 53% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-9880H is 1% better than Core i7-11370H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i9-9880H | 54% |
Core i7-11370H | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.4 | 94.2 | | Valorant | 108.4 | 107.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 59.9 | | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 100.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 80.3 | | Overwatch | 87.8 | 86.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 73.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 53.5 | | Warzone | 84.5 | 83.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 91.0 | 89.9 | | Valheim | 90.0 | 88.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i9-9880H | 82% |
Core i7-11370H | 176% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-11370H is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9880H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 30W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i7-11370H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 191 | 117 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1535 | 1120 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 447 | 273 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3462 | 2511 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1162 | 713 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 8311 | 6644 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i7-11370H | | Single-Core | 2554 | 1592 | | Multi-Core | 14080 | 12123 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i7-11370H | | Single-Core | 1118 | 1588 | | Multi-Core | 7238 | 6074 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i7-11370H | | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | January 20, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Coffee Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 9 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 16 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 12 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 8600 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 30 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-11370H is 30% better than Core i9-9880H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-9880H has 4 more core than Core i7-11370H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9880H is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11370H is better: 9
However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-9880H and Intel Core i7-11370H before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-9880H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i7-11370H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
|
|
|
