 |
Intel Core i9-9880H vs Apple M1 Pro |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-9880H vs Apple M1 Pro and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Furmark, 3DMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, 7zip, SuperPi, Blender, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PCMark 10, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Blender, WPrime, RealBench. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Apple M1 Pro or Intel Core i9-9880H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-9880H | 54% |
M1 Pro | 59% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, M1 Pro is 8% better than Core i9-9880H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-9880H | 54% |
M1 Pro | 57% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.4 | 101.0 | Valorant | 108.4 | 114.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 64.3 | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 107.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 86.1 | Overwatch | 87.8 | 93.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 79.2 | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 57.4 | Warzone | 84.5 | 89.5 | Assassin's Creed | 91.0 | 96.4 | Valheim | 90.0 | 95.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-9880H | 82% |
M1 Pro | 358% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Pro is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9880H since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 16W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Apple M1 Pro | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 191 | 304 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1535 | 1716 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 447 | 590 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3462 | 2936 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1162 | 2233 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 8311 | 11512 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Apple M1 Pro | Single-Core | 2554 | 5046 | Multi-Core | 14080 | 32596 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Apple M1 Pro | Single-Core | 1118 | 1723 | Multi-Core | 7238 | 12737 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-9880H |
Apple M1 Pro | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | October 07, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | M1 | Core name | Coffee Lake | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Architecture | x86 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 9 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 8 | 10 | Threads | 16 | 10 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 8600 millions | 34000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 16 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | 208 GByte/s | L1 cache | | 4MB | L2 cache | | 24MB | L3 cache | 16 MB | 24MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| APL1103 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 Pro is 28% better than Core i9-9880H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that M1 Pro has 2 more core than Core i9-9880H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9880H is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Pro is better: 30 Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-9880H and Apple M1 Pro before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-9880H Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Apple M1 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|