|
Intel Core i9-9880H vs Intel Core i5-10210U |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i9-9880H vs Intel Core i5-10210U tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Blender, Blender, SuperPi, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, MATLAB, Prime95, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, PCMark 10, 7zip, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, RealBench, Furmark, Gears 5. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10210U or Intel Core i9-9880H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-9880H | 54% |
Core i5-10210U | 51% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-9880H is 5% better than Core i5-10210U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-9880H | 54% |
Core i5-10210U | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.4 | 92.2 | Valorant | 108.4 | 104.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 58.7 | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 98.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 78.6 | Overwatch | 87.8 | 84.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 72.3 | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 52.4 | Warzone | 84.5 | 81.7 | Assassin's Creed | 91.0 | 88.0 | Valheim | 90.0 | 87.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-9880H | 82% |
Core i5-10210U | 243% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-10210U is more energy efficient than the Core i9-9880H as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i5-10210U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 191 | 168 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1535 | 567 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 447 | 426 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3462 | 1206 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1162 | 883 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 8311 | 3462 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i5-10210U | Single-Core | 2554 | 2254 | Multi-Core | 14080 | 6569 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i5-10210U | Single-Core | 1118 | 1094 | Multi-Core | 7238 | 4116 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-9880H |
Intel Core i5-10210U | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1528 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 1.6 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Threads | 16 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 8600 millions | 4800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133, LPDDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 16 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-9880H is 30% better than Core i5-10210U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-9880H has 4 more core than Core i5-10210U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9880H is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10210U is better: 5 Although it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-9880H and Intel Core i5-10210U before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-9880H Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i5-10210U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
| |
|