|
Intel Core i3-7101TE vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250C |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-7101TE vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250C tests and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like SuperPi, RealBench, WPrime, 3DMark, MATLAB, Prime95, UserBenchmark, PassMark, Blender, PCMark 10, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Furmark, 7zip. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 3 3250C or Intel Core i3-7101TE.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-7101TE | 51% |
Ryzen 3 3250C | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-7101TE | 51% |
Ryzen 3 3250C | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.1 | 89.9 | Valorant | 102.4 | 102.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.3 | 57.2 | Apex Legends | 96.2 | 96.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.8 | 76.6 | Overwatch | 82.9 | 82.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.6 | 70.5 | DOOM Eternal | 51.2 | 51.1 | Warzone | 79.8 | 79.6 | Assassin's Creed | 86.0 | 85.8 | Valheim | 85.0 | 84.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-7101TE | 85% |
Ryzen 3 3250C | 193% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 3250C is more energy efficient than the Core i3-7101TE since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-7101TE |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 126 | 142 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 290 | 354 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 309 | 318 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 544 | 774 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 512 | 573 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1986 | 2346 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7101TE |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Single-Core | 2089 | 1946 | Multi-Core | 3973 | 4330 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7101TE |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Single-Core | 899 | 871 | Multi-Core | 2031 | 1825 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-7101TE |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Announcement date | March 07, 2017 | September 22, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FP5 | Core name | Kaby Lake | Dali | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 7 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 3800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 192KB | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 3 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| YM325CC4T2OFG
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-7101TE is 23% better than Ryzen 3 3250C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-7101TE is better: 20
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3250C is better: 14 Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-7101TE and AMD Ryzen 3 3250C before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-7101TE Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U
| |
|