|
Intel Core i3-10110Y vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250C |
|
Processor comparisons 02-07-2021 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-10110Y vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250C and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like PCMark 10, Blender, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, SuperPi, PassMark, Furmark, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Blender, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, RealBench, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Valheim
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 3 3250C or Intel Core i3-10110Y.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10110Y | 51% |
Ryzen 3 3250C | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10110Y | 50% |
Ryzen 3 3250C | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.7 | 89.9 | Valorant | 102.0 | 102.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.1 | 57.2 | Apex Legends | 95.9 | 96.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.5 | 76.6 | Overwatch | 82.6 | 82.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.4 | 70.5 | DOOM Eternal | 51.0 | 51.1 | Warzone | 79.5 | 79.6 | Assassin's Creed | 85.7 | 85.8 | Valheim | 84.6 | 84.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10110Y | 444% |
Ryzen 3 3250C | 193% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10110Y is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 3 3250C as it consumes less power: 7W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10110Y |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 105 | 142 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 272 | 354 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 268 | 318 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 632 | 774 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 450 | 573 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1746 | 2346 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10110Y |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Single-Core | 2271 | 1946 | Multi-Core | 3493 | 4330 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10110Y |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Single-Core | 934 | 871 | Multi-Core | 1712 | 1825 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-10110Y |
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | September 22, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | UTFCBGA1377 | FP5 | Core name | Amber Lake Y | Dali | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 10 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 1 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 858 millions | 3800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 15 W | Memory type | LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 33.33 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 192KB | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YM325CC4T2OFG
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 3250C is 61% better than Core i3-10110Y in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10110Y is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3250C is better: 25 Although it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-10110Y and AMD Ryzen 3 3250C before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-10110Y Processor Comparisons • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U
| |
|