 |
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9634 |
|
Processor comparisons 13-03-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD EPYC 9634 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Prime95, Blender, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, Gears 5, SuperPi, 7zip, WPrime, MATLAB, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Handbrake, RealBench.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valheim
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9634 or AMD EPYC 9374F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9374F | 71% |
EPYC 9634 | 94% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9634 is 24% better than EPYC 9374F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9374F | 76% |
EPYC 9634 | 94% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 134.3 | 165.4 | | Valorant | 152.7 | 188.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.5 | 105.3 | | Apex Legends | 143.5 | 176.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.5 | 141.0 | | Overwatch | 123.7 | 152.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.3 | 129.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 76.3 | 94.0 | | Warzone | 119.1 | 146.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 128.2 | 157.9 | | Valheim | 126.7 | 156.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9374F | 24% |
EPYC 9634 | 15% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9374F is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9634 since it has less power consumption: 320W vs. 290W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9634 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 184 | 445 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 8716 | 17927 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 371 | 827 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 18501 | 37987 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 954 | 2016 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 48156 | 98767 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9634 | | Single-Core | 2177 | 4237 | | Multi-Core | 70650 | 144876 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9634 | | Single-Core | 2319 | 1331 | | Multi-Core | 45439 | 75930 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9374F |
AMD EPYC 9634 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 4 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.85 MHz | 2.25 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 84 | | Threads | 64 | 168 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 116000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 320 W | 290 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 384MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000792
100-100000792WOF | 100-000000797
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9374F is 41% better than EPYC 9634 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9634 has 52 more core than EPYC 9374F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9374F is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9634 is better: 25
However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9374F and AMD EPYC 9634 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9374F Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9634 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
