 |
AMD EPYC 7232P vs AMD EPYC 9224 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7232P vs AMD EPYC 9224 and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Furmark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, MATLAB, PassMark, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, PCMark 10, AIDA64, SuperPi, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Prime95, Gears 5.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9224 or AMD EPYC 7232P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7232P | 55% |
EPYC 9224 | 65% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9224 is 15% better than EPYC 7232P. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7232P | 55% |
EPYC 9224 | 68% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.8 | 120.6 | | Valorant | 110.0 | 137.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.6 | 76.7 | | Apex Legends | 103.4 | 128.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.5 | 102.8 | | Overwatch | 89.1 | 111.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.9 | 94.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 55.0 | 68.5 | | Warzone | 85.8 | 106.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.4 | 115.1 | | Valheim | 91.3 | 113.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7232P | 26% |
EPYC 9224 | 27% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9224 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7232P as it consumes less power: 120W vs. 200W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7232P |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 211 | 130 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1570 | 6125 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 372 | 260 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3480 | 13002 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1255 | 670 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 9326 | 33841 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7232P |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Single-Core | 1367 | 1530 | | Multi-Core | 16608 | 49648 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7232P |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Single-Core | 965 | 1629 | | Multi-Core | 8637 | 31932 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7232P |
AMD EPYC 9224 | | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 24 | | Threads | 16 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 42000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 120 W | 200 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 85 GByte/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 32MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000081
100-100000081WOF | 100-000000939
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7232P is 19% better than EPYC 9224 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9224 has 16 more core than EPYC 7232P. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7232P is better: 6
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9224 is better: 28
However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7232P and AMD EPYC 9224 before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7232P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9224 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
