|
AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 9334 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 9334 and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, rendering, programming, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, SuperPi, MATLAB, Prime95, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, Blender, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, Handbrake, RealBench, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5. And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9334 or AMD EPYC 9454P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 9454P | 73% |
EPYC 9334 | 70% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454P is 4% better than EPYC 9334. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 9454P | 80% |
EPYC 9334 | 75% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 142.3 | 132.6 | Valorant | 161.7 | 150.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.6 | 84.4 | Apex Legends | 152.0 | 141.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.3 | 113.0 | Overwatch | 131.0 | 122.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.6 | 104.0 | DOOM Eternal | 80.9 | 75.3 | Warzone | 126.2 | 117.5 | Assassin's Creed | 135.9 | 126.6 | Valheim | 134.2 | 125.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 9454P | 17% |
EPYC 9334 | 35% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9334 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9454P as it consumes less power: 290W vs. 210W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 9334 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 156 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9744 | 8366 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 421 | 334 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 20676 | 17782 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1073 | 896 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 53807 | 46317 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 9334 | Single-Core | 2439 | 2073 | Multi-Core | 78937 | 67962 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 9334 | Single-Core | 1540 | 2209 | Multi-Core | 53258 | 43703 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 9334 | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP5 | SP5 | Core name | Genoa | Genoa | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 4 | Generation | 4 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 2.75 MHz | 2.7 MHz | Cores | 48 | 32 | Threads | 96 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 290 W | 210 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR5 | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 128MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | 100-000000873 100-000000873WOF | 100-000000800 100-100000800WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9454P is 1% better than EPYC 9334 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9454P has 16 more core than EPYC 9334. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454P is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9334 is better: 3 All the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 9454P and AMD EPYC 9334 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 9454P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9334 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|