|
Unisoc UIS8141E vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 |
|
Comparisons 03-11-2023 Detailed testing data of Unisoc UIS8141E vs Unisoc Tiger T7520, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PCMark, Geekbench, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Unisoc UIS8141E or Tiger T7520.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
Tiger T7520 | 17% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Unisoc UIS8141E | 42% |
Tiger T7520 | 78% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
Tiger T7520 | 16% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Tiger T7520 | Total score | 42551 | 236686 | CPU | 11923 | 66278 | GPU | 16177 | 89949 | MEM | 6807 | 37865 | UX | 7663 | 42609 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Tiger T7520 | Single-Core | 112 | 488 | Multi-Core | 519 | 1952 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Tiger T7520 | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 3 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 18 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tiger T7520 is 40% better than Unisoc UIS8141E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Unisoc UIS8141E has 4 more core than Tiger T7520. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T820 | Mali-G57 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 10.2 | 846 | # of Cores | 1 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 12.2 | 26.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 34.6 | 30.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 22.5 | 55.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.5 | 36.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 29.1 | 22.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 44.5 | 34.9 | Real Racing 3 | 40.2 | 69.5 | Sniper 3D | 29.8 | 122.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 41.1 | 89 | Mortal Kombat X | 26.5 | 63.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 32.8 | 77.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 100 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Makalu IVY510 5G | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 8000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 4000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc UIS8141E is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T7520 is better: 35 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Unisoc UIS8141E SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Tiger T7520 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|