HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T7520

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T7520, speed examination of GPUs Mali-G57 MP6 and Mali-G57 MP6.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Tiger T7520 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A76). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Mozilla Kraken, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5, AnTuTu, GFXBench, PassMark, Vellamo, Octane V2, Quadrant, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chips in Sniper 3D, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, PUBG etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G or Tiger T7520 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G

24%

Tiger T7520

17%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G

78%

Tiger T7520

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G

21%

Tiger T7520

16%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G	Tiger T7520
Total score	345831	236686
CPU	96840	66278
GPU	131412	89949
MEM	55325	37865
UX	62245	42609

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G	Tiger T7520
Single-Core	746	488
Multi-Core	2536	1952

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G	Tiger T7520
Frequency	2360 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	6	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	3x2.22 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	12 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	1066
Memory bandwidth	31.78	29
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		256 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G is 6% better than Tiger T7520 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G has 2 more core than Tiger T7520. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MP6	Mali-G57 MP6
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	846	846
# of Cores	6	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.3	26.8
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	57.8	30.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	47.7	55.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	43.8	36.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	47.9	22.5
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	74.5	34.9
Real Racing 3	95.4	69.5
Sniper 3D	104.9	122.3
Need for Speed No Limits	76.3	89
Mortal Kombat X	76.3	63.9
CSR Racing 2	62	77.8

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	48 MP	100 MP
Dual Camera resolution	24 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Vivi Magic
Video Encoding FPS	60	30
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	21	Makalu IVY510 5G
Download speed	7350 MBit/s.	8000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3400 MBit/s.	4000 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G is better: 19
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T7520 is better: 16
You need to know that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G specs and review.

Tiger T7520 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T7520 specs and review.