|
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula |
|
Comparisons 27-03-2023 Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Helio G36 vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, GeekBench 6, Neocore, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, Antutu v10, 9, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Helio G36 or T760 Tanggula.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio G36 | 7% |
T760 Tanggula | 19% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio G36 | 72% |
T760 Tanggula | 80% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio G36 | 5% |
T760 Tanggula | 18% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio G36 |
T760 Tanggula | Total score | 109300 | 276292 | CPU | 30606 | 77358 | GPU | 41543 | 104988 | MEM | 17493 | 44197 | UX | 19671 | 49730 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio G36 |
T760 Tanggula | Single-Core | 223 | 570 | Multi-Core | 983 | 2279 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio G36 |
T760 Tanggula | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4/4x/4y | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 14.9 | 48 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 256 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 846 | # of Cores | 2 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 31.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.8 | 49.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 41.3 | 43.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.7 | 38.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 21.4 | 45.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 27.7 | 64.5 | Real Racing 3 | 83.8 | 65.5 | Sniper 3D | 91.2 | 56.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 75.6 | 52.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 48.2 | 63.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 50.9 | 52.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 50 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Ivy V510 5G | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 2700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 1500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G36 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T760 Tanggula is better: 31 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Helio G36 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
T760 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
| |
|