|
Unisoc T760 Tanggula vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 |
|
Comparisons 26-08-2021 Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc T760 Tanggula vs HiSilicon Kirin 985, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Vellamo, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PCMark, Neocore, 3DMark, Geekbench, PassMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Minecraft, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy T760 Tanggula or Kirin 985.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreT760 Tanggula | 19% |
Kirin 985 | 30% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)T760 Tanggula | 80% |
Kirin 985 | 75% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingT760 Tanggula | 18% |
Kirin 985 | 29% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | T760 Tanggula |
Kirin 985 | Total score | 276292 | 423580 | CPU | 77358 | 118598 | GPU | 104988 | 160953 | MEM | 44197 | 67777 | UX | 49730 | 76252 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | T760 Tanggula |
Kirin 985 | Single-Core | 570 | 880 | Multi-Core | 2279 | 2995 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | T760 Tanggula |
Kirin 985 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2580 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.58 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 34.1 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 985 is 14% better than T760 Tanggula in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G77 MP8 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 846 | 628 | # of Cores | 6 | 8 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 31.7 | 27.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 49.4 | 54.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 43.5 | 56.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 38.3 | 41.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 45.4 | 45.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 64.5 | 75.1 | Real Racing 3 | 65.5 | 98.4 | Sniper 3D | 56.5 | 106.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 52.2 | 89.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 63.3 | 73.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 52.3 | 73.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 64 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | 21 | Download speed | 2700 MBit/s. | 1277 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 175 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T760 Tanggula is better: 17
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 985 is better: 23 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
T760 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
Kirin 985 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
| |
|