|
Unisoc SC9863A1 vs Unisoc Tiger T700 |
|
Comparisons 13-06-2023 Detailed testing data of Unisoc SC9863A1 vs Unisoc Tiger T700, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like AnTuTu, Geekbench, PassMark, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, GTA, Minecraft, Call of Duty, PUBG, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy SC9863A1 or Unisoc Tiger T700.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSC9863A1 | 5% |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | 18% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)SC9863A1 | 39% |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSC9863A1 | 3% |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | 16% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | SC9863A1 |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | Total score | 78669 | 258893 | CPU | 22021 | 72481 | GPU | 29889 | 98385 | MEM | 12590 | 41412 | UX | 14160 | 46594 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | SC9863A1 |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | Single-Core | 203 | 569 | Multi-Core | 916 | 2050 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | SC9863A1 |
Unisoc Tiger T700 | Frequency | 1700 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Unisoc Tiger T700 is 15% better than SC9863A1 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GM 9446 | GPU Frequency | 510 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 146.2 | 247.35 | # of Cores | 128 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 28.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.3 | 45.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.7 | 40.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 14.7 | 36.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.6 | 43.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 14.6 | 59.6 | Real Racing 3 | 47.6 | 61.2 | Sniper 3D | 35.3 | 78.6 | Need for Speed No Limits | 32.9 | 65.1 | Mortal Kombat X | 35.4 | 59.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 29.3 | 45.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-4 | LTE-7 | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9863A1 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T700 is better: 31 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
SC9863A1 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Unisoc Tiger T700 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|