|
Unisoc SC9863A1 vs Qualcomm QCM4290 |
|
Comparisons 13-06-2023 Comprehensive testing data of Unisoc SC9863A1 vs Qualcomm QCM4290, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Neocore, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc. After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy SC9863A1 or QCM4290.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | SC9863A1 |
QCM4290 | Total score | 78669 | 177332 | CPU | 22021 | 49659 | GPU | 29889 | 67391 | MEM | 12590 | 28382 | UX | 14160 | 31915 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | SC9863A1 |
QCM4290 | Single-Core | 203 | 363 | Multi-Core | 916 | 1526 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | SC9863A1 |
QCM4290 | Frequency | 1700 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 11 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 933 | 1866/933 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 13.91 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 256 KB | | L2 cache | 512 KB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCM4290 is 15% better than SC9863A1 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | IMG8322 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 510 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 146.2 | 312 | # of Cores | 128 | | # of Shader Units | | 192 | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 900 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 24.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 14.3 | 28.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.7 | 59.5 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 14.7 | 31.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 11.6 | 24.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 14.6 | 34.7 | Real Racing 3 | 47.6 | 89.5 | Sniper 3D | 35.3 | 95.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 32.9 | 83.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 35.4 | 77.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 29.3 | 83.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Triple ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | LTE-4 | Qualcomm QCM4290 LTE modem | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 410 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 170 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GLONASS, Galileo, SBAS, Beidou, GNSS, GPS, QZSS, NavIC | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9863A1 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM4290 is better: 29 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
SC9863A1 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
QCM4290 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430
| |
|