MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

Comparisons 20-05-2022

Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like GFXBench, Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, Geekbench, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 1300 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

57%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

73%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

78%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

54%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

72%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 1300	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Total score	801200	1014839
CPU	224335	284157
GPU	304453	385631
MEM	128197	162372
UX	144219	182662

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 1300	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Single-Core	1455	1415
Multi-Core	4766	4462

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 1300	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Frequency	3000 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	4 nm
Transistors count	5800 millions
Core configuration	2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	4266	3200
Memory bandwidth	32	88
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	32 KB	1 MB
L2 cache	320 KB	2 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Adreno 730
GPU Frequency	800 MHz	970 MHz
GFloPS	504	1800
# of Cores	9
# of Shader Units		1024
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	7680 x 4320 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	31.1	38.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	94.8	120.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.6	71.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	52.2	65.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	81.5	102.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	117.1	148.7
Real Racing 3	113.7	144.2
Sniper 3D	125.5	158.9
Need for Speed No Limits	79.7	100.7
Mortal Kombat X	82.5	103.4
CSR Racing 2	68.6	87.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 680
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	6000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5	NavIC enabled, GNSS, Beidou, Galileo, NavIC, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is better: 30
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 1300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 specs and review.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 specs and review.