|
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula |
|
Comparisons 31-08-2022 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft, Madout2, Asphalt 9, GTA, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 820 or T770 Tanggula.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Kompanio 820 | 31% |
T770 Tanggula | 22% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Kompanio 820 | 78% |
T770 Tanggula | 79% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Kompanio 820 | 29% |
T770 Tanggula | 20% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
T770 Tanggula | Total score | 434348 | 317736 | CPU | 121620 | 88970 | GPU | 165046 | 120734 | MEM | 69495 | 50842 | UX | 78182 | 57189 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
T770 Tanggula | Single-Core | 662 | 656 | Multi-Core | 2622 | 2621 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 820 |
T770 Tanggula | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2500 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4/4x/4y | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 48 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 256 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here T770 Tanggula is 12% better than MediaTek Kompanio 820 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G57 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 705.5 | 846 | # of Cores | 5 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.6 | 26.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 54.7 | 55.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 56.9 | 60.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 41.4 | 37.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 48.3 | 48.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 73.9 | 75.6 | Real Racing 3 | 71.5 | 121.4 | Sniper 3D | 124.7 | 78.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 79.4 | 72.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 81.6 | 96.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 62.7 | 84.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 24 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | Ivy V510 5G | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 2700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1800 MBit/s. | 1500 MBit/s. | Navigation | Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5 | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 820 is better: 18
The number of parameters for which Unisoc T770 Tanggula is better: 18 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Kompanio 820 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
T770 Tanggula SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|