MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Neocore, AnTuTu, Vellamo, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Geekbench, PCMark, PassMark, and how good the SoCs are in games PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2 etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra or Snapdragon 695.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

47%

Snapdragon 695

26%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

84%

Snapdragon 695

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

44%

Snapdragon 695

24%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Snapdragon 695
Total score	1024044	373695
CPU	286722	104639
GPU	389132	142008
MEM	163842	59795
UX	184337	67274

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Snapdragon 695
Single-Core	1253	836
Multi-Core	4256	2846

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Snapdragon 695
Frequency	3100 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	8 nm
Transistors count	8600 millions
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR4x (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	32 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	1866
Memory bandwidth	51	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB
L2 cache	2 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is 29% better than Snapdragon 695 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Adreno 619
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	912	712
# of Cores	6
# of Shader Units		320
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	38.4	26.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	121.7	41.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	72.2	51.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	66.7	34.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	103.9	34.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	149.1	51.7
Real Racing 3	145.2	64.6
Sniper 3D	160.3	66.6
Need for Speed No Limits	100.3	71.7
Mortal Kombat X	104.7	66.2
CSR Racing 2	87.2	61.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Imagiq 785 ISP	Qualcomm Spectra 355L
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	2800 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2750 MBit/s.	1200 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	SBAS, Beidou, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, GNSS, NavIC, GPS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra specs and review.

Snapdragon 695 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 695 specs and review.