MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, GFXBench, PassMark, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra or Dimensity 9300.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

47%

Dimensity 9300

100%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

84%

Dimensity 9300

86%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

44%

Dimensity 9300

97%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Dimensity 9300
Total score	1024044	1391808
CPU	286722	389698
GPU	389132	528887
MEM	163842	222686
UX	184337	250527

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Dimensity 9300
Single-Core	1253	1591
Multi-Core	4256	5786

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Dimensity 9300
Frequency	3100 MHz	3000 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	4 nm
Transistors count	8600 millions	9200 millions
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 4x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A720 2x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A520
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	7500
Memory bandwidth	51	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L2 cache	2 MB	8 MB
L3 cache	4 MB	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is 3% better than Dimensity 9300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Immortalis-G720 MC20
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	912	3600
# of Cores	6	20
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	38.4	52.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	121.7	165.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	72.2	98.4
Call of Duty: Mobile	66.7	91.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	103.9	140.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	149.1	202.7
Real Racing 3	145.2	198.2
Sniper 3D	160.3	216.2
Need for Speed No Limits	100.3	137.9
Mortal Kombat X	104.7	143.1
CSR Racing 2	87.2	118.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Imagiq 785 ISP
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2750 MBit/s.	3100 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is better: 3
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9300 is better: 27
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra specs and review.

Dimensity 9300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 9300 specs and review.