|
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
|
Comparisons 29-10-2024 Full comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, Vellamo, Geekbench, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra or Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra | 47% |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 100% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra | 84% |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 87% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra | 44% |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | 99% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Total score | 1024044 | 2166423 | CPU | 286722 | 606599 | GPU | 389132 | 823250 | MEM | 163842 | 346627 | UX | 184337 | 389957 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Single-Core | 1253 | 2475 | Multi-Core | 4256 | 7865 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra |
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Frequency | 3100 MHz | 3720 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm | Transistors count | 8600 millions | 14000 millions | Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.72 GHz Cortex-X4 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A515 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 4266 | Memory bandwidth | 51 | 92 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 32 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is 16% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Adreno 740 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 980 MHz | GFloPS | 912 | 2138 | # of Cores | 6 | | # of Shader Units | | 2048 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 38.4 | 52.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 121.7 | 164.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 72.2 | 98.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 66.7 | 91.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 103.9 | 140.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 149.1 | 202.1 | Real Racing 3 | 145.2 | 197.6 | Sniper 3D | 160.3 | 216.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 100.3 | 137.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 104.7 | 142.8 | CSR Racing 2 | 87.2 | 118.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 360 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 240 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Imagiq 785 ISP | Qualcomm Spectra 770 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X75 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 29000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2750 MBit/s. | 9000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5 | NavIC enabled, QZSS, SBAS, NavIC, GNSS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, GPS, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is better: 36 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|