MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

Comparisons 17-10-2023

Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GFXBench, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu, Geekbench, Quadrant, Vellamo, Neocore, 3DMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus or Snapdragon 695.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus

29%

Snapdragon 695

26%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus

84%

Snapdragon 695

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus

26%

Snapdragon 695

24%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus	Snapdragon 695
Total score	410676	373695
CPU	114994	104639
GPU	156066	142008
MEM	65705	59795
UX	73931	67274

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus	Snapdragon 695
Single-Core	829	836
Multi-Core	2023	2846

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus	Snapdragon 695
Frequency	2200 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	6 nm	8 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory	12 Gb	8 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1866
Memory bandwidth	17.07	14.9
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Adreno 619
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	486	712
# of Cores	2
# of Shader Units		320
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	30.6	26.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	46.5	41.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.3	51.6
Call of Duty: Mobile	39.9	34.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	37.3	34.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	56.1	51.7
Real Racing 3	70.6	64.6
Sniper 3D	106.1	66.6
Need for Speed No Limits	67.8	71.7
Mortal Kombat X	64.1	66.2
CSR Racing 2	73.9	61.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	108 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 355L
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	3GPP R16 5G Multi-Mode	Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System
Download speed	3300 MBit/s.	2800 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1500 MBit/s.	1200 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+L5, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1+E5a, BeiDou B1I+B2a, NavIC	SBAS, Beidou, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, GNSS, NavIC, GPS
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	No	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is better: 13
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus specs and review.

Snapdragon 695 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 695 specs and review.