Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Unisoc Tiger T700 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Unisoc Tiger T700

Comparisons   03-12-2021
   Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Unisoc Tiger T700, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of chips in GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 695 or Unisoc Tiger T700.


 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Unisoc Tiger T700

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon 69526% Unisoc Tiger T70018%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon 69574% Unisoc Tiger T70068%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon 69524% Unisoc Tiger T70016%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon 695 Unisoc Tiger T700
Total score373695258893
CPU10463972481
GPU14200898385
MEM5979541412
UX6727446594

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon 695 Unisoc Tiger T700
Single-Core836569
Multi-Core28462050

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon 695 Unisoc Tiger T700
Frequency2200 MHz2000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography8 nm12 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
8x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75
Power consumption (TDP)6 W5 W
Memory typeLPDDR4x (Quad Channel)LPDDR4
Max. Memory8 Gb8 Gb
Memory Frequency18661066
Memory bandwidth14.929
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache256 KB
L2 cache1 MB
L3 cache2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 695 is 9% better than Unisoc Tiger T700 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 619PowerVR GM 9446
GPU Frequency950 MHz970 MHz
GFloPS712247.35
# of Cores3
# of Shader Units320
Display2840 x 2160 pixels2160 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile26.628.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)41.645.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra51.640.2
Call of Duty: Mobile34.836.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)34.443.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition51.759.6
Real Racing 364.661.2
Sniper 3D66.678.6
Need for Speed No Limits71.765.1
Mortal Kombat X66.259.1
CSR Racing 261.145.6
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution192 MP48 MP
Dual Camera resolution16 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 355LVivi Magic
Video Encoding FPS24030
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemSnapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF SystemLTE-7
Download speed2800 MBit/s.300 MBit/s.
Upload speed1200 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
NavigationSBAS, Beidou, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, GNSS, NavIC, GPSGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T700 is better: 13
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 695 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Unisoc Tiger T700 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Snapdragon 695 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9825
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T710
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus


Unisoc Tiger T700 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula
• Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS4290
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Helio G36
• Vs Unisoc SC9863A1
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
• Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands