Comparisons 03-12-2021
Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G96, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like Geekbench, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Quadrant, Vellamo, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, GTA, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 695 or MediaTek Helio G96.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 695 | 68% |
MediaTek Helio G96 | 62% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 695 | 75% |
MediaTek Helio G96 | 56% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 695 | 66% |
MediaTek Helio G96 | 55% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 695 |
MediaTek Helio G96 | | Total score | 373695 | 325749 | | CPU | 101719 | 105656 | | GPU | 126702 | 90250 | | MEM | 58124 | 69225 | | UX | 52732 | 60357 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 695 |
MediaTek Helio G96 | | Single-Core | 836 | 587 | | Multi-Core | 2846 | 1786 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 695 |
MediaTek Helio G96 | | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2050 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 8 nm | 12 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 4x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
4x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver | 2x2.05 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 10 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 14.9 | | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 695 is 6% better than MediaTek Helio G96 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 | | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 950 MHz | | GFloPS | 712 | 486 | | # of Cores | | 2 | | # of Shader Units | 320 | | | Display | 2840 x 2160 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 108 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System | 4G LTE WorldMode modem | | Download speed | 2800 MBit/s. | 600 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1200 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, Beidou, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, GNSS, NavIC, GPS | Galileo E1 + E5a, NAVIC, GPS, BeiDou B1C + B2a, QZSS L1+ L5 | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G96 is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000L Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• MediaTek Dimensity 930 Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• MediaTek Kompanio 900T Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Samsung Exynos 1280 Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Unisoc Tiger T612 Vs MediaTek Helio G96
|
