|
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs Qualcomm QCS7230 |
|
Comparisons 29-10-2024 Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs Qualcomm QCS7230, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra or QCS7230.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra | 47% |
QCS7230 | 48% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra | 84% |
QCS7230 | 79% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra | 44% |
QCS7230 | 45% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra |
QCS7230 | Total score | 1024044 | 669389 | CPU | 286722 | 187418 | GPU | 389132 | 254358 | MEM | 163842 | 107092 | UX | 184337 | 120490 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra |
QCS7230 | Single-Core | 1253 | 1052 | Multi-Core | 4256 | 3681 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra |
QCS7230 | Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 8600 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x2.8 GHz Kryo 585 Gold 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 Gold 1x1.8 GHz Kryo 585 Silver | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 2750 | Memory bandwidth | 51 | 44 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is 9% better than QCS7230 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Adreno 650 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 645 MHz | GFloPS | 912 | 1348 | # of Cores | 6 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 38.4 | 25.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 121.7 | 78.9 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 72.2 | 47.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 66.7 | 43.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 103.9 | 67.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 149.1 | 98.8 | Real Racing 3 | 145.2 | 82.1 | Sniper 3D | 160.3 | 89.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 100.3 | 75.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 104.7 | 54.3 | CSR Racing 2 | 87.2 | 66.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Imagiq 785 ISP | Qualcomm Spectra 480 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2750 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5 | GPS, GNSS, SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, GLONASS, QZSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS7230 is better: 9 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
QCS7230 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
| |
|