MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Unisoc Tiger T820

Comparisons 22-09-2023

Detailed comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Unisoc Tiger T820, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, and how good the chipsets are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, GTA, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra or Tiger T820.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

51%

Tiger T820

34%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

86%

Tiger T820

81%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

49%

Tiger T820

33%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Tiger T820
Total score	719546	480533
CPU	201463	134552
GPU	273436	182597
MEM	115118	76880
UX	129523	86490

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Tiger T820
Single-Core	1059	702
Multi-Core	3716	2896

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	Tiger T820
Frequency	2200 MHz	2700 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR4/4x/4y
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tiger T820 is 18% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G57 MP6
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	912	846
# of Cores	6	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2160 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.1	28.2
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	85.5	42.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.1	55.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	47.1	52.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	73.2	34.1
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	106.8	54.9
Real Racing 3	103.1	110.5
Sniper 3D	113.5	104.5
Need for Speed No Limits	62.6	77.5
Mortal Kombat X	82.1	88.4
CSR Racing 2	67.4	65.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Vivi Magic 6.0
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Ivy V510 5G
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	3500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T820 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra specs and review.

Tiger T820 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tiger T820 specs and review.