|
Unisoc UIS8141E vs Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|
Comparisons 03-11-2023 Full testing data of Unisoc UIS8141E vs Unisoc Tiger T820, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Vellamo, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Geekbench, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Unisoc UIS8141E or Tiger T820.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
Tiger T820 | 34% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Unisoc UIS8141E | 42% |
Tiger T820 | 81% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
Tiger T820 | 33% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Tiger T820 | Total score | 42551 | 480533 | CPU | 11923 | 134552 | GPU | 16177 | 182597 | MEM | 6807 | 76880 | UX | 7663 | 86490 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Tiger T820 | Single-Core | 112 | 702 | Multi-Core | 519 | 2896 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Tiger T820 | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 2700 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 1x2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 3 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4/4x/4y | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 18 | 48 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tiger T820 is 51% better than Unisoc UIS8141E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Unisoc UIS8141E has 4 more core than Tiger T820. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T820 | Mali-G57 MP6 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 10.2 | 846 | # of Cores | 1 | 6 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 12.2 | 28.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 34.6 | 42.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 22.5 | 55.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.5 | 52.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 29.1 | 34.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 44.5 | 54.9 | Real Racing 3 | 40.2 | 110.5 | Sniper 3D | 29.8 | 104.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 41.1 | 77.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 26.5 | 88.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 32.8 | 65.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic 6.0 | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Ivy V510 5G | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc UIS8141E is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T820 is better: 40 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Unisoc UIS8141E SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Tiger T820 SoC Comparisons • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
| |
|