 |
Unisoc Tiger T820 vs Unisoc SC79863a |
|
Comparisons 22-06-2023 Full compare data of Unisoc Tiger T820 vs Unisoc SC79863a, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Tiger T820 or Unisoc SC79863a.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreTiger T820 | 34% |
Unisoc SC79863a | 5% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Tiger T820 | 81% |
Unisoc SC79863a | 37% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingTiger T820 | 33% |
Unisoc SC79863a | 4% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Tiger T820 |
Unisoc SC79863a | Total score | 480533 | 80874 | CPU | 134552 | 22639 | GPU | 182597 | 30740 | MEM | 76880 | 12930 | UX | 86490 | 14567 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Tiger T820 |
Unisoc SC79863a | Single-Core | 702 | 209 | Multi-Core | 2896 | 942 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Tiger T820 |
Unisoc SC79863a | Frequency | 2700 MHz | 1600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4/4x/4y | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 4 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 933 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tiger T820 is 40% better than Unisoc SC79863a in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP6 | IMG8322 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 510 MHz | GFloPS | 846 | 146.2 | # of Cores | 6 | 128 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.2 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 42.1 | 15.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 55.1 | 27.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 52.4 | 16.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 34.1 | 12.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 54.9 | 15.6 | Real Racing 3 | 110.5 | 41.9 | Sniper 3D | 104.5 | 36.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 77.5 | 33.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 88.4 | 44.7 | CSR Racing 2 | 65.7 | 36.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 108 MP | 16 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Vivi Magic 6.0 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Ivy V510 5G | LTE-4 | Download speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T820 is better: 34
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC79863a is better: 3 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Tiger T820 SoC Comparisons • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Unisoc SC79863a SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|