 |
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Google Tensor G2 |
|
Comparisons 07-06-2023 Detailed testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Google Tensor G2, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 8050 or Google Tensor G2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreDimensity 8050 | 54% |
Google Tensor G2 | 64% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Dimensity 8050 | 82% |
Google Tensor G2 | 85% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingDimensity 8050 | 52% |
Google Tensor G2 | 62% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 8050 |
Google Tensor G2 | Total score | 760798 | 888986 | CPU | 213023 | 248916 | GPU | 289096 | 337807 | MEM | 121725 | 142228 | UX | 136943 | 160015 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 8050 |
Google Tensor G2 | Single-Core | 1219 | 1164 | Multi-Core | 4243 | 3194 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 8050 |
Google Tensor G2 | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2850 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.34 GHz Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 51.2 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 1 MB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8050 is 5% better than Google Tensor G2 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G710 MP07 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 504 | 1535.23 | # of Cores | 9 | 16 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 30.1 | 34.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 90.3 | 105.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 53.7 | 63.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 50.5 | 58.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 77.9 | 90.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 111.9 | 129.1 | Real Racing 3 | 108.7 | 126.9 | Sniper 3D | 119.1 | 138.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 75.8 | 88.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 79.9 | 91.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 65.7 | 75.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5123 | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 9750 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a | Beidou, GLONASS, SBAS, Dual frequency GNSS, GNSS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, NavIC enabled, NavIC | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8050 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G2 is better: 32 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Dimensity 8050 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Google Tensor G2 SoC Comparisons • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Apple M1 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Google Tensor G2 Vs Google Tensor • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Google Tensor G2 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Google Tensor G2 Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Google Tensor G2 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Google Tensor G2 Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Google Tensor G2 Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Google Tensor G2 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Google Tensor G2 Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Google Tensor G2 Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Google Tensor G2 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Google Tensor G2 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
| |
|