 |
MediaTek MT8188J vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 |
|
Comparisons 18-06-2023 Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek MT8188J vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, AnTuTu, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, Geekbench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy MT8188J or Dimensity 8050.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT8188J | 25% |
Dimensity 8050 | 54% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT8188J | 72% |
Dimensity 8050 | 82% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT8188J | 24% |
Dimensity 8050 | 52% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT8188J |
Dimensity 8050 | Total score | 360113 | 760798 | CPU | 100831 | 213023 | GPU | 136847 | 289096 | MEM | 57613 | 121725 | UX | 64810 | 136943 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT8188J |
Dimensity 8050 | Single-Core | 665 | 1219 | Multi-Core | 2195 | 4243 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT8188J |
Dimensity 8050 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 4266 | Memory bandwidth | 28 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8050 is 26% better than MT8188J in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 504 | # of Cores | 2 | 9 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.5 | 30.1 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 55.6 | 90.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.1 | 53.7 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 37.7 | 50.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 46.4 | 77.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 71.9 | 111.9 | Real Racing 3 | 67.6 | 108.7 | Sniper 3D | 72.1 | 119.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.1 | 75.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.2 | 79.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 58.4 | 65.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 750 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 300 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8188J is better: 7
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8050 is better: 32 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
MT8188J SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Dimensity 8050 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|