Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050

Comparisons   08-06-2023
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like AnTuTu, Neocore, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
   After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Dimensity 9200 Plus or Dimensity 8050.


 
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
MediaTek Dimensity 8050

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Dimensity 9200 Plus99% Dimensity 805054%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Dimensity 9200 Plus86% Dimensity 805082%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Dimensity 9200 Plus97% Dimensity 805052%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Dimensity 9200 Plus Dimensity 8050
Total score1384198760798
CPU387571213023
GPU526003289096
MEM221468121725
UX249146136943

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Dimensity 9200 Plus Dimensity 8050
Single-Core15831219
Multi-Core57544243

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Dimensity 9200 Plus Dimensity 8050
Frequency3350 MHz3000 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography4 nm6 nm
Transistors count9200 millions
Core configuration1x3.35 GHz ARM Cortex-X3
3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A715
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR5xLPDDR4x
Max. Memory32 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency85534266
Memory bandwidth6424
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache1 MB
L2 cache8 MB
L3 cache32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.4-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 9200 Plus is 10% better than Dimensity 8050 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUImmortalis-G715 MC16Mali-G77 MC9
GPU Frequency750 MHz800 MHz
GFloPS3200504
# of Cores169
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1440 pixels2520 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile52.630.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)164.990.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra98.653.7
Call of Duty: Mobile91.250.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)140.177.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition201.9111.9
Real Racing 3197.4108.7
Sniper 3D215.7119.1
Need for Speed No Limits137.775.8
Mortal Kombat X142.379.9
CSR Racing 2118.665.7
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution320 MP200 MP
Dual Camera resolution64 MP32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS240240
Video Encoding resolution8K, 4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1H.264, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode5G Multi-Mode
Download speed7500 MBit/s.4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed3100 MBit/s.2500 MBit/s.
NavigationGalileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavICGalileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a
NFC supportYesNo
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus is better: 37
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8050 is better: 2
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Dimensity 9200 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Dimensity 8050 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Dimensity 9200 Plus SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


Dimensity 8050 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands