|
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 vs Intel Pentium N6415 |
|
Processor comparisons 28-06-2021 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Pentium Silver N6005 vs Intel Pentium N6415 tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as SuperPi, 3DMark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Furmark, AIDA64, WPrime, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Gears 5, PassMark, Blender. Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Pentium N6415 or Intel Pentium Silver N6005.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Pentium Silver N6005 | 51% |
Pentium N6415 | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Pentium Silver N6005 | 51% |
Pentium N6415 | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.2 | 89.4 | Valorant | 102.5 | 101.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.4 | 56.9 | Apex Legends | 96.3 | 95.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.9 | 76.2 | Overwatch | 83.0 | 82.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.7 | 70.1 | DOOM Eternal | 51.2 | 50.8 | Warzone | 79.9 | 79.3 | Assassin's Creed | 86.1 | 85.4 | Valheim | 85.1 | 84.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Pentium Silver N6005 | 257% |
Pentium N6415 | 378% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Pentium N6415 is more energy efficient than the Pentium Silver N6005 as it consumes less power: 10W vs. 6W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Pentium Silver N6005 |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 106 | 122 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 353 | 440 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 219 | 207 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 812 | 679 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 697 | 514 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2579 | 1896 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium Silver N6005 |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Single-Core | 1576 | 1976 | Multi-Core | 4169 | 3840 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium Silver N6005 |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Single-Core | 771 | 681 | Multi-Core | 2152 | 1416 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Pentium Silver N6005 |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Announcement date | January 01, 2020 | January 01, 2016 | Type | Laptop | Embedded | Socket | FCBGA1338 | FCBGA1493 | Core name | Jasper Lake | Elkhart Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 7 | 7 | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 1.2 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 1400 millions | 1400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | 4x32 LPDDR4/x 3200MT/s Max 16GB / 2x64 DDR4 3200MT/s Max 32GB | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 1.5 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Pentium Silver N6005 is 40% better than Pentium N6415 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium Silver N6005 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium N6415 is better: 6 Although it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Pentium Silver N6005 and Intel Pentium N6415 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Core i7-6500U
Intel Pentium N6415 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
| |
|