|
Intel Pentium N6415 vs AMD Athlon 300GE |
|
Processor comparisons 28-06-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Pentium N6415 vs AMD Athlon 300GE and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, video editing, programming, streaming. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Blender, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Furmark, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, Prime95, Handbrake, MATLAB, WPrime, Blender, RealBench, 7zip, Gears 5. And how good the processors are in games: - Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Athlon 300GE or Intel Pentium N6415.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Pentium N6415 | 51% |
Athlon 300GE | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Pentium N6415 | 50% |
Athlon 300GE | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.4 | 90.2 | Valorant | 101.6 | 102.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.9 | 57.4 | Apex Legends | 95.5 | 96.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.2 | 76.9 | Overwatch | 82.3 | 83.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.1 | 70.7 | DOOM Eternal | 50.8 | 51.3 | Warzone | 79.3 | 80.0 | Assassin's Creed | 85.4 | 86.1 | Valheim | 84.4 | 85.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Pentium N6415 | 378% |
Athlon 300GE | 89% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Pentium N6415 is more energy efficient than the Athlon 300GE as it consumes less power: 6W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Pentium N6415 |
AMD Athlon 300GE | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 122 | 89 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 440 | 471 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 207 | 225 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 679 | 1027 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 514 | 580 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1896 | 2791 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium N6415 |
AMD Athlon 300GE | Single-Core | 1976 | 2097 | Multi-Core | 3840 | 4919 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Pentium N6415 |
AMD Athlon 300GE | Single-Core | 681 | 942 | Multi-Core | 1416 | 2187 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Pentium N6415 |
AMD Athlon 300GE | Announcement date | January 01, 2016 | July 07, 2019 | Type | Embedded | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1493 | AM4 | Core name | Elkhart Lake | Picasso | Architecture | x86 | Zen+ | Generation | 7 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3 MHz | | Frequency | 1.2 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1400 millions | 2200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 35 W | Memory type | 4x32 LPDDR4/x 3200MT/s Max 16GB / 2x64 DDR4 3200MT/s Max 32GB | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2667 | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 192KB | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YD30GEC6M2OFH
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Athlon 300GE is 64% better than Pentium N6415 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Pentium N6415 has 2 more core than Athlon 300GE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium N6415 is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon 300GE is better: 28 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Pentium N6415 and AMD Athlon 300GE before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Pentium N6415 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
AMD Athlon 300GE Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K
| |
|