|
Intel Core m3-8100Y vs Intel Pentium N6415 |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core m3-8100Y vs Intel Pentium N6415 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, PassMark, Prime95, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, AIDA64, SuperPi, MATLAB, 7zip, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, Gears 5, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Furmark, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of processors in: - DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Pentium N6415 or Intel Core m3-8100Y.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core m3-8100Y | 50% |
Pentium N6415 | 51% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Pentium N6415 is 1% better than Core m3-8100Y. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core m3-8100Y | 50% |
Pentium N6415 | 50% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.6 | 89.4 | Valorant | 101.8 | 101.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.0 | 56.9 | Apex Legends | 95.7 | 95.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.4 | 76.2 | Overwatch | 82.5 | 82.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.3 | 70.1 | DOOM Eternal | 50.9 | 50.8 | Warzone | 79.4 | 79.3 | Assassin's Creed | 85.5 | 85.4 | Valheim | 84.5 | 84.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core m3-8100Y | 582% |
Pentium N6415 | 378% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core m3-8100Y is more energy efficient than the Pentium N6415 since it has less power consumption: 5W vs. 6W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core m3-8100Y |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 93 | 122 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 176 | 440 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 231 | 207 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 412 | 679 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 411 | 514 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1509 | 1896 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core m3-8100Y |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Single-Core | 1784 | 1976 | Multi-Core | 3053 | 3840 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core m3-8100Y |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Single-Core | 873 | 681 | Multi-Core | 1584 | 1416 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core m3-8100Y |
Intel Pentium N6415 | Announcement date | October 01, 2018 | January 01, 2016 | Type | Laptop | Embedded | Socket | FCBGA1515 | FCBGA1493 | Core name | Amber Lake Y | Elkhart Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 7 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3 MHz | Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 1.2 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 5700 millions | 1400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | 4x32 LPDDR4/x 3200MT/s Max 16GB / 2x64 DDR4 3200MT/s Max 32GB | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 33.3 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 1.5 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Pentium N6415 is 8% better than Core m3-8100Y in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Pentium N6415 has 2 more core than Core m3-8100Y. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core m3-8100Y is better: 21
The number of parameters for which Intel Pentium N6415 is better: 12 Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core m3-8100Y and Intel Pentium N6415 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core m3-8100Y Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core i5-7287U
Intel Pentium N6415 Processor Comparisons • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
| |
|