|
Intel Core i9-13950HX vs Intel Core i5-11600KF |
|
Processor comparisons 14-11-2022 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i9-13950HX vs Intel Core i5-11600KF and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Handbrake, Furmark, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, AIDA64, Blender, Gears 5, Prime95, RealBench, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, 3DMark, VeraCrypt. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11600KF or Intel Core i9-13950HX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-13950HX | 64% |
Core i5-11600KF | 56% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13950HX is 12% better than Core i5-11600KF. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-13950HX | 64% |
Core i5-11600KF | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 112.9 | 95.1 | Valorant | 128.3 | 108.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 71.9 | 60.5 | Apex Legends | 120.6 | 101.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.2 | 81.0 | Overwatch | 103.9 | 87.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.5 | 74.6 | DOOM Eternal | 64.2 | 54.0 | Warzone | 100.1 | 84.3 | Assassin's Creed | 107.8 | 90.8 | Valheim | 106.5 | 89.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-13950HX | 124% |
Core i5-11600KF | 42% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-13950HX is more energy efficient than the Core i5-11600KF since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-13950HX |
Intel Core i5-11600KF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 446 | 197 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4439 | 1886 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 726 | 460 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 9835 | 4227 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2507 | 1201 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28251 | 11189 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13950HX |
Intel Core i5-11600KF | Single-Core | 2295 | 2680 | Multi-Core | 48131 | 20410 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-13950HX |
Intel Core i5-11600KF | Single-Core | 2423 | 1605 | Multi-Core | 24434 | 6942 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-13950HX |
Intel Core i5-11600KF | Announcement date | November 12, 2022 | January 20, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rocket Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 MHz | 4.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Cores | 24 | 6 | Threads | 32 | 12 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 5400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-3200 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 50 GB/s | L1 cache | 4 MB | | L2 cache | 24 MB | 3 MB | L3 cache | 68 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-11600KF is 12% better than Core i9-13950HX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13950HX has 18 more core than Core i5-11600KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13950HX is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11600KF is better: 5 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i9-13950HX and Intel Core i5-11600KF before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-13950HX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H
Intel Core i5-11600KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Apple M1 Ultra
| |
|